|
|
|
|
JOURNAL OF POLYMER ENGINEERING
Vol. 22, No. 5, 2002, page 305
MULTIPLE QUALITY CRITERIA OPTIMIZATION IN REACTIVE IN-MOLD COATING WITH A DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS APPROACH Mauricio
Cabrera-Ríos1, José M. Castro2,,
Clark A. Mount-Campbell3 1Postdoctoral
Researcher, Email address: cabrera-rios.1@osu.edu 2Professor,
Email address: castro.38@osu.edu 3
Associate Professor, Email address: mount-campbell.1@osu.edu Department
of Industrial, Welding, and Systems Engineering The
Ohio State University 210
Baker Systems, 1971 Neil Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA Tel.:
614-688-4173 Fax:
614-292-7852 Abstract
Reactive in-mold coating (IMC) products
have been used successfully for many years to improve the surface quality of
Sheet Molding Compound (SMC) compression molded parts. IMC provides a smooth,
sealed surface used as conductive or non-conductive primer for subsequent
finished painting operations. The success of IMC for SMC pans has recently
attracted the interest of thermoplastic injection molders. The potential
environmental and economic benefits of using IMC as a primer and, in the ideal
case, to replace painting completely are large. Most optimization studies in
Reactive Polymer Processing involve a compromise between different performance
measures. In most cases the controllable variables have a conflicting effect on
the relevant performance measures. IMC is not the exception. These performance
measures need to be balanced, each against the other, in order to obtain the
best compromise. The ideal compromise will depend on the final part quality
requirements. In this work, the use of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is
explored to identify the best compromises among several performance measures. We
have selected two case studies to illustrate the use of this technique. In the
first case, we apply DEA to select the locations for two IMC injection nozzles
for a thermoplastic part to optimize two quality measures. In the second case,
we study the simultaneous optimization of cycle time, surface quality, and
dimensional consistency for SMC pans. The first case is aimed to demonstrate the
application of DEA with a simple example; in fact, the best compromises in such
example could have been identified graphically. The 'second case, however,
provides an example where the multidimensionality of the problem makes the use
of DEA critical to elicit a proper solution. |
|
Freund Publishing House Ltd, P.O. Box 35010, Tel Aviv, Israel, 61350. Tel: 972-3- 562-8540; Fax: 972-3-562-8538 E-mail: h_freund@netvision.net.il; website: https://www.freundpublishing.com
|